Breaking Down Quantum’s Impact on Chemistry, Climate, and AI Integration

http://Breaking%20Down%20Quantum’s%20Impact%20on%20Chemistry,%20Climate,%20and%20AI%20Integration

In this episode, hosts Frank La Vigne and Candace Gillhoolley sit down with Adhisha Gammanpila, founder and CEO of Feynman—an innovative company making quantum computing accessible for everyone, no PhD required. Together, they dive into the rapidly evolving quantum landscape, discussing how AI-driven copilots are transforming protein simulation, climate modeling, and drug discovery—tasks that used to take months and now can be accomplished in minutes.

Adhisha Gammanpila shares his journey from university research to launching a platform that abstracts away the complexities of quantum gates, letting scientists focus on their real-world problems instead of getting caught up in the technical details. The conversation explores the intersection of quantum and climate innovation, how AI and quantum are powering new solutions, and what it really takes to build meaningful climate tech in today’s world. They also examine misconceptions about quantum’s role in climate change, advice for students and entrepreneurs, and look ahead to the breakthroughs that lie just around the corner.

Whether you’re deeply invested in quantum or just curious about its impact, this episode is full of insights into how quantum and AI, working together, are poised to solve some of our biggest challenges.

Links

  1. Adhisha Gammanpila on LinkedIn – https://www.linkedin.com/in/adhisha-gammanpila/

Time Stamps

00:00 “Quantum Computing for Everyone”

04:40 “Building a Quantum Ecosystem”

08:24 “AI-Driven Quantum Computing Copilot”

11:51 “Quantum Chemistry Driving Innovation”

15:10 “Versatile Quantum Coding Platform”

18:17 “Quantum Algorithms for Optimization”

22:49 Emulating Nature for Energy Efficiency

26:03 “Quantum Energy Teleportation Vision”

29:56 “Quantum Computers Misconceptions Explained”

32:01 “Climate Action Starts Locally”

38:06 Sri Lanka’s Growing Innovation Ecosystem

39:15 Global Expansion and Collaboration Opportunities

44:15 “Hype, Skepticism, and Innovation”

46:14 “Moving the World Forward”

51:12 “Think Big, Start Small”

52:44 “Gratitude for Today’s Discussion”

Transcript
Speaker:

So that the copilot will take the entire protein sequence, map

Speaker:

it to a quantum circuit and then run and give you back the results.

Speaker:

So this, we did it within six

Speaker:

minutes. You can do a protein simulation on

Speaker:

a quantum computer or a quantum simulator under six minutes. When

Speaker:

breakthroughs move that fast, the future stops being theoretical and

Speaker:

starts getting impactful. This is Impact Quantum

Speaker:

podcast. Turn it up fast, Kenneth. Blowing my

Speaker:

mind at last. Hello and welcome

Speaker:

back to Impact Quantum the podcast. We explore the emerging field

Speaker:

and industry that is quantum computing. We don't need to have a PhD, be

Speaker:

a quantum physicist or really know anything at

Speaker:

all. You just need to be a little bit curious and a little bit self

Speaker:

driven. And again, the most quantum curious and self driven

Speaker:

person I know is Candace Gooley. How's it going, Candace? It's great. Thank

Speaker:

you, Frank. I have to say though, today is exceptionally cold. Everyone's going

Speaker:

through this like Arctic, this like Arctic temperatures. And even

Speaker:

us here in Montreal, Quebec, we are shivering. It is

Speaker:

really crazy cold. It's not much warmer

Speaker:

down here in Maryland. It's very cold.

Speaker:

This is usually January, February weather,

Speaker:

not pre Christmas weather. That's right. I

Speaker:

guess the Arctic blasts are going to do their thing.

Speaker:

Yes, yes. So today we're going to be speaking with

Speaker:

Adhisha Gamanpila and

Speaker:

he is the CEO and founder of

Speaker:

Feynman and we're really excited to talk to him today.

Speaker:

He's a lot of good things. He's a lot of really interesting talents and

Speaker:

I can't wait to dig in a little farther. Awesome. Now is it Feynman or

Speaker:

is it Feynman? I thought it was like named after Richard Feynman. It's Feynman.

Speaker:

Right? Okay, cool. Just check, just check it out.

Speaker:

That's okay. So he's checking on me, making sure. No worries. I

Speaker:

got your back, Candace. There we go. There we go.

Speaker:

Welcome to the show. So obviously you named your company, your company's named

Speaker:

after Richard Feynman. So I'm going to go out on the limb here and say

Speaker:

it has something to do with physics.

Speaker:

So who are you and what do you do? Absolutely. So I can

Speaker:

decide. Frank, it's so good to be here. And I think the climate

Speaker:

is changing a lot and that could also be a good

Speaker:

topic for us to speak about today. So I'm

Speaker:

Adisha, founder and CEO of Feynman, starting from Richard

Speaker:

Feynman, just like Frank mentioned. So pretty much

Speaker:

what we do is we help

Speaker:

anyone, even without zero quantum knowledge to use quantum

Speaker:

computers. So you don't have to have a Ph.D. you don't have to go through

Speaker:

the deep mathematics to to experience the power of quantum.

Speaker:

So make we make quantum easy to use. So

Speaker:

that's what we do at Feynman and we want to

Speaker:

put our tooling in front of every quantum computer that's out there

Speaker:

so that anyone could easily make use of quantum. So that's what we

Speaker:

are doing. Frank and Candice love to have a deeper discussion around

Speaker:

it and super excited. Well, let's just

Speaker:

go ahead Candice. Sorry. Before we dig deep I wanted to

Speaker:

take a little step back because I really like to understand where

Speaker:

people like they come to the information. So when you were

Speaker:

back and you were back at university, were you already into

Speaker:

physics? Were you computer science? Were you something else? What brought

Speaker:

you Tell us a little bit about your path. Absolutely,

Speaker:

absolutely. So I studied computer science along

Speaker:

with physics, the classical side of physics

Speaker:

as well as quantum side of physics. And

Speaker:

I wanted to pursue my higher studies in theoretical physics

Speaker:

study quantum physics. So while studying computer

Speaker:

science I wanted to do a practical application

Speaker:

with computer science and theoretical physics. That is somewhere around

Speaker:

2017 that's when IBM

Speaker:

also started giving out cloud access to quantum computers.

Speaker:

Then I wanted to run a

Speaker:tion on a Quantum computer in:Speaker:

So I did not realize how difficult it was back then. So I

Speaker:hich was written somewhere on:Speaker:early:Speaker:

to run it on IBM quantum computer. The running part was around

Speaker:

few hours but preparing to run it was like six months of work.

Speaker:

The transformation of transformation of the

Speaker:

classical models to quantum and then the learning curve mapping the

Speaker:

data set to the quantum circuits and

Speaker:

it was, it was really hard and it practically did not

Speaker:

run the larger use case but for a smaller use case

Speaker:

of a similar fashion was possible.

Speaker:

That gave me the understanding how difficult it is in a first hand

Speaker:

experience. And then I was also doing courses at MIT

Speaker:

via online. Then Covid came and I published my paper

Speaker:

and then a lot of reviews came across from the student community, research community.

Speaker:

How did you do it? So

Speaker:

that was a moment of realization to understand, okay, there

Speaker:

are people who need quantum who want to run quantum but they're

Speaker:

struggling and they give up on the idea of going quantum. And

Speaker:

there are engineers who wants to try quantum but they're interested in

Speaker:

results so they need quick access they not to go through all the science

Speaker:

behind it. So I started seeing all these variations

Speaker:

and last year we brought out our platform

Speaker:

with the APIs, the copilot where we have the learning

Speaker:

modules to build out this entire quantum

Speaker:

ecosystem. So that's how we got it into play.

Speaker:

Candice and Frank. Interesting.

Speaker:

That's a good point because there is that moment of my personal

Speaker:

first exposure to quantum computing was I was at a Microsoft

Speaker:

conference and I was so excited about this. I went

Speaker:

back to the hotel that night and I installed Q Sharp. And then I

Speaker:

realized what now I felt like I had

Speaker:

got a glimpse of this wonderful world, but then

Speaker:

I had, I suppose the tools. But like I felt like a caveman

Speaker:

banging, you know, banging with rocks, you know, like I held

Speaker:

this massive wall of like, okay, now what? Right? And I think ever since

Speaker:

then I've always been like, okay, now what? You know,

Speaker:

and I'm curious to see how your tools kind of address that. Right. Because

Speaker:

you know, I would imagine that I'm not the only

Speaker:

one that's going to, you know, has already. Has already had that experience or will

Speaker:

in the near future.

Speaker:

Absolutely. So that feeling is

Speaker:

feeling of, okay, you run your first single

Speaker:

qubit or one or two qubit. Okay, you run

Speaker:

it on a simulator or a quantum computer and you get the results.

Speaker:

You get 100 shots and you put these gates and okay, you

Speaker:

really come to a moment, okay, now what, what does

Speaker:

this really mean? What can I do with it?

Speaker:

So that is where the practicality of using quantum comes in.

Speaker:

Because if you really look at it, we are using gates,

Speaker:

we call it Hadamard gate and different other gates. In a classical

Speaker:

world we have similar gates like the N gate, the not gate.

Speaker:

You can't write a software platform with these gates combined.

Speaker:

You can't bring all these gates together and write it. That's

Speaker:

impossible. Theoretically you could, but no one will do it.

Speaker:

But theoretically possible. But when I talk

Speaker:

to folks about kind of these new gates and you know,

Speaker:

the I guess and an OR logic you do deal with in

Speaker:

programming on a regular basis, but the exclusive or like the X

Speaker:

naught like these are not things you normally normal day to day

Speaker:

enterprise or people in career would do. It's usually like you

Speaker:

learn it in your first semester of computer science and you never

Speaker:

hear of it again unless you do some kind of weird research.

Speaker:

Exactly. But those become the fundamental building

Speaker:

blocks. But there's so much of abstraction built

Speaker:

on top of it

Speaker:

over the years in the classical world where the programming frameworks like as

Speaker:

we don't have to talk about these gates anymore now what

Speaker:

we do is we build that abstraction through our

Speaker:

copilot

Speaker:

with the world with AI transformations coming in co Pilots coming in to

Speaker:

every avenue of things we do, from research to web development

Speaker:

to application. So we build this quantum computing

Speaker:

copilot where you as a scientist could put

Speaker:

your requirements in natural language. Let's say I'm a climate

Speaker:

scientist, I insert my data set

Speaker:

and I tell, hey, I want to run this, I want

Speaker:

to do this prediction. You click

Speaker:

enter, that's it. So the Agentix system takes out the requirement,

Speaker:

splits the requirement, looks at the data set, creates

Speaker:

the quantum circuit, runs it or creates a code,

Speaker:

creates the circuit, run it on a quantum computer or a

Speaker:

simulator, gives you back the results and then you can tell, hey,

Speaker:

okay, can we adjust this space and run back and

Speaker:

say and see how the results are going to change so

Speaker:

that, that, that is how we are solving this. We have created

Speaker:

this environment where you could tell your requirement and the agent system

Speaker:

will generate the code, run it on a simulator quantum computer and

Speaker:

give you back the results. So here you don't have to worry about

Speaker:

how quantum computers work. What is the architecture of the quantum computer, what is

Speaker:

the language, whether it's going to be Q Shop,

Speaker:

Qiskit or Open

Speaker:

Chasm. So you don't have to worry about it. You just need to pick the

Speaker:

infrastructure and just run it and get your results. You need to

Speaker:

know your subject matter only if you're into finance, no problem. You know your

Speaker:

finances, you, if you're into climate, you

Speaker:

have your subject matter around that. A great example,

Speaker:

a great example is that we integrated our platform

Speaker:

with Google with AlphaFold.

Speaker:

AlphaFold is a global database of proteins

Speaker:

and you just have to call

Speaker:

out which protein you need and then tell the requirements so that the

Speaker:

copilot will take the entire protein sequence, map it to

Speaker:

a quantum circuit and then run and give you back the results.

Speaker:

So this, we did it within six

Speaker:

minutes. You can do a protein simulation on

Speaker:

a quantum computer or a quantum simulator under six minutes

Speaker:

without tooling, without it, it's just months of work. I actually

Speaker:

did it by, in a airport during a transit. That is how we released this

Speaker:

feature to the platform. I was testing it with my team while I was

Speaker:

traveling and it worked and we pushed it. And it's

Speaker:

imagine you trying to map out a protein to a quantum circuit. It's

Speaker:

unimaginable. So this just six minutes.

Speaker:

I understand that most of you, your focus seems to be on

Speaker:

climate modeling. And so what

Speaker:

do you see as the strongest near term opportunity

Speaker:

that we're going to see in quantum and climate

Speaker:

modeling? Absolutely, absolutely.

Speaker:

Now, right now, if you look at the market,

Speaker:

probably let's say the European market, for example, we see a lot

Speaker:

of pharmaceutical companies are doing a lot of

Speaker:

research or research around quantum chemistry,

Speaker:

how molecules interact and in terms

Speaker:

of drug discovery, likewise. So fundamentally it's

Speaker:

around chemistry, I would say. So there are a lot of chemistry use

Speaker:

cases and these chemistry use cases also spans

Speaker:

into material discovery, sustainability, sustainable

Speaker:

materials, fertilizer research, which will impact on,

Speaker:

let's say ammonia production for climate,

Speaker:

likewise. But fundamentally chemistry has become a major use case for

Speaker:

R and D which will impact on

Speaker:

climate as well as other similar avenues like drug discovery,

Speaker:

likewise. And even like sustainable paints,

Speaker:

sustainable material for flights. So these are like very popular

Speaker:

use cases that are being industrially research,

Speaker:

not academically industrially researched.

Speaker:

And even recently I have seen content coming out

Speaker:

from World Economic Forum, Bloomberg, how these enterprises

Speaker:

have actually have

Speaker:

experience to a certain degree of

Speaker:

quantum advantage, like the signals of that. So

Speaker:

those are the real world use cases that are happening at the moment.

Speaker:

On the flip side, when it comes to

Speaker:

cyber security, that is on the quantum safety side,

Speaker:

the entire world is preparing when the hardware maturity comes in,

Speaker:

how our infrastructure will be secured. So the, the quantum

Speaker:

cryptography part is already there.

Speaker:

Nationwide, the preparations are taking place. Enterprise wide it's

Speaker:

taking place, but it's on another avenue of

Speaker:

quantum. But on the quantum computing field, quantum chemistry, climate

Speaker:

modeling, drug discovery, those are very, very popular use

Speaker:

cases that's happening out there. Yeah,

Speaker:

no, I mean that's a good way to put it. Right. Um, there's a

Speaker:

lot chemistry is going to obviously kind of the, the quantum

Speaker:

encryption aspect is, is top of mind for a lot of people

Speaker:

for good reason. But also the whole notion of the chemistry,

Speaker:

how this is going to revolutionize chemistry, medicine, material

Speaker:

science, better sustainable

Speaker:

products. Yeah. So

Speaker:

would it be fair to like give an elevator pitch if I had to give

Speaker:

an elevator pitch for your product that this is kind of like quantum Vibe co.

Speaker:

Or is that. You can say that. You can say that. Okay,

Speaker:

interesting. In a very, very generalized sense. So

Speaker:

when it comes to white coding, the thing is like for a

Speaker:

Vibe code, like if we have around 100 plus

Speaker:

scientists on our platform right now, pretty

Speaker:

much in the Europe, UK and US and they're

Speaker:

pretty much PhD students of

Speaker:

postdoctoral candidates, researchers. Right. So

Speaker:

it's very hard to imagine it's Vibe coding

Speaker:

because the experience that we see on the platform is they actually know

Speaker:

quantum to a great extent. It's a matter of saving time for

Speaker:

them and even picking hardware because the platform does it.

Speaker:

But in a very, very general sense, it's more of like a wide coding platform,

Speaker:

but it's,

Speaker:

we see different behaviors coming in with our different

Speaker:

user groups. It sometimes operates as a research assistant for them to

Speaker:

prototype certain research ideas faster before going and using it on

Speaker:

a supercomputer. We see that behavior coming and from

Speaker:

industrial users we see it more of like, just like you said, a wide coding

Speaker:

platform. They don't care about how the nitty gritty is bug. They need

Speaker:

results. So they want to prototype and see so

Speaker:

different sides of it. But yeah.

Speaker:

But I also like the fact that it abstracts away a lot of the harder

Speaker:

aspects of the quantum gates

Speaker:

and the quantum software creation. Right. I think

Speaker:

subject matter experts are still going to be important. Obviously your

Speaker:

company is probably filled with physicists, people who are experts in how these gates

Speaker:

go. So it's not just like your average vibe coding tool

Speaker:

that everybody and their cousin and their cousin's dog has out now, right?

Speaker:

Yeah, no, that's fascinating. I think, I think that'll, that'll help ease

Speaker:

the transition for a lot of folks into quantum kind of

Speaker:

the quantum space. Absolutely. And just to add to it,

Speaker:

Frank, we recently published a paper

Speaker:

where we compared our agentic system against

Speaker:

popular LLMs from Claude to Gemini to

Speaker:

OpenAI and we compared how the code was

Speaker:

generated, the quality of the code, like when our system

Speaker:

was completely outperforming the classical or the traditional

Speaker:

models. And Even with

Speaker:

Qiskit V2, most of these platforms are

Speaker:

popularly available. LLMs are not generating the latest code

Speaker:

or sometimes the code is wrong. So the

Speaker:

agentic system we have built with our fine tuned models or the

Speaker:

optimized model for quantum is directly outperforming

Speaker:

those cases. So that's where our value proposition really

Speaker:

comes in. Because existing models out there are not serving the community,

Speaker:

they have to keep on trying. Sometimes it does not work and sometimes it takes

Speaker:

the requirement in a wrong way. And then

Speaker:

these are like very

Speaker:

scientifically intensive things. Right. So the,

Speaker:

the, the model should be very much fine

Speaker:

tuned for that subject matter. So that is how

Speaker:

we have handled it as a separate proprietary

Speaker:

model of ours. So how do

Speaker:

you evaluate whether a problem is quantum ready

Speaker:

versus still better solve classically or even with

Speaker:

hybrid meth? Absolutely, absolutely. So

Speaker:

that's, that's actually where most of our scientists are engaged

Speaker:

with us in terms of breaking it. And there are different frameworks

Speaker:

to it, but in a, in a theoretical

Speaker:

point of view we have the NP hard problems, the ones that we can be

Speaker:

classical solvable, the ones that are difficult to

Speaker:

solve likewise. So

Speaker:

now if you look at the it actually goes to the

Speaker:

point of how we map this optimization problem

Speaker:

to like, for example, how we map this optimization problem,

Speaker:

whether it's classically solvable or it's. It's not. So

Speaker:

there are certain theoretical frameworks that are used in math and

Speaker:

likewise. So we try to map it to, against that

Speaker:

and then take out the ones that should go onto quantum and then

Speaker:

we take that part and then figure out which

Speaker:

quantum algorithm will best serve for this. It could

Speaker:

be like a variational quantum algorithm or

Speaker:

likewise. So that splitting takes place and that is where

Speaker:

more and more effort is. We also put with our scientific teams,

Speaker:

the advisors to better architect

Speaker:

splitting this. Now, in an industrial standpoint,

Speaker:

we call this quantum centric supercomputing, where 95

Speaker:

of the load is run on CPUs and GPUs and

Speaker:

the last 5% is run on a quantum computer. So I think

Speaker:

this word was even coined like one year ago, I suppose. So

Speaker:

it's a very, very novel area. So even cracking that, how to

Speaker:

which to go to quantum, it's not to go to quantum or classical. So it's

Speaker:

heavily scientific. But getting the agents to do it is

Speaker:

much more difficult. So that's, that's how we are trying to crack it.

Speaker:

Candice. I mean

Speaker:

earlier you mentioned ammonia production and

Speaker:

carbon capture. I believe so.

Speaker:

Do you think that quantum

Speaker:

simulations for catalysts like ammonia production or

Speaker:

carbon capture are closer to

Speaker:

feasibility than pharmaceutical modeling?

Speaker:

Okay,

Speaker:

it's, it's a little bit difficult for me to say which is closer. It

Speaker:

depends on how the scientists are doing it. Likewise.

Speaker:

But if you look at fundamentally why we

Speaker:

use quantum. Just quoting from Richard Feynman, that is

Speaker:

to simulate nature. And.

Speaker:

I, I even read this article on McKinsey, like how they have mentioned this.

Speaker:

If you look at nature, ammonia is produced through

Speaker:

microorganisms, through enzymes, without a very

Speaker:

complicated Haber Bosch process that's completed through chemical

Speaker:

reactions. How does that chemical reaction happens?

Speaker:

Still, it's not computable. And for

Speaker:

that only quantum is coming in to simulate nature. That's what Richard

Speaker:

Feynman said. So

Speaker:

the purpose of existence of quantum is to simulate nature.

Speaker:

A really great way to put it. Sorry, I

Speaker:

really liked how you put it that way. I'm sorry, go ahead. No, so,

Speaker:

so I think when it comes to medical

Speaker:

research, pharmaceuticals, it's fundamentally, it's again chemistry, right?

Speaker:

How the biological systems are operating.

Speaker:

So fundamentally it's just, it's, it's again the chemistry, right?

Speaker:

It's how, how the electrons are reacting, how the protons are the

Speaker:

the, the, the elements are reacting at a fundamental level.

Speaker:

So that's why I was looking at chemistry at a root level rather

Speaker:

than the application lay.

Speaker:

I think

Speaker:

this is my gut feel. I'm not sure. I think

Speaker:

there would be more

Speaker:

medical use cases coming in

Speaker:

compared to fertilizer research,

Speaker:

I think because of the commercialization and the intensive research funding

Speaker:

that's happening on that side. But it's

Speaker:

just a point of view. Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah. I mean that's a big part of energy

Speaker:

production today is that it is creating fertilizer

Speaker:

for. Through the Haber process, which is named after some

Speaker:

German guy who figured out how to make

Speaker:

ammonia, which is crucial for basically any,

Speaker:

for a lot of industrial processes, but namely fertilizer.

Speaker:

But to your point, microbes can do it, right? Microbes don't

Speaker:

need an entire, don't need a lot of energy, yet they're

Speaker:

able to do it right. And there's just a lot that

Speaker:

we can emulate nature, but there's a lot we don't understand

Speaker:

in terms of how it just does it so efficiently. And this goes even to

Speaker:

our brains, right? In the virtual green room. We're talking about AI and my quote

Speaker:

unquote day job in AI. Right. And I was joking about

Speaker:

how I like to keep my office warm with this.

Speaker:

But all of our, the human brain consumes something like 25 watts

Speaker:

of power and it's able to do

Speaker:

what, you know, as of today, we'll

Speaker:

see the Deep Sea papers tend to come out around this time of

Speaker:

year. So we'll see. But what conventional hardware

Speaker:

and conventional AI researchers have not yet been able to duplicate,

Speaker:

which would be effectively AGI. Right, but

Speaker:

with data centers and data centers and nuclear power plants. Right. Yet we're

Speaker:

able to do it with a monster energy drink

Speaker:

and

Speaker:

a candy bar. And even then that's not really

Speaker:

good for you, Right? Exactly, exactly.

Speaker:

So when you're evaluating other climate tech

Speaker:

startups in the ecosystem, what signals

Speaker:

tell you that they're building something real.

Speaker:

When it comes to.

Speaker:

No, the climate climate

Speaker:

tech space is

Speaker:

huge. Like let's say data from platforms which

Speaker:

tracks, let's say

Speaker:

ESG metrics to where

Speaker:

they do very research

Speaker:

oriented products as well. So it's a, it's a,

Speaker:

it's a very broad spectrum. Now if you

Speaker:

ask me, when you ask me the question, how do you assess whether they are

Speaker:

doing something real? So

Speaker:

they do it because they believe it. Right, so and they do it

Speaker:

because they believe it. And even if it does not sound

Speaker:

realistic and

Speaker:

it's not my call to make whether it's, it's going to be real because, because

Speaker:

of the people who thought it's going to be real. Only certain things happen in

Speaker:

world. Even, even from the

Speaker:

computing to every other technology or the scientific discoveries that

Speaker:

we see out there in the world. Right? So it's. So when I

Speaker:

see a company who is doing something

Speaker:

like extremely challenging, I tend to get excited

Speaker:

and I put my whole heart and soul to wish them good luck

Speaker:

to make it happen. Because personally, deep down, like for example,

Speaker:

quantum for me, quantum computing or the co pilot that we do is it.

Speaker:

It's actually the starting point. So we have a big vision with what

Speaker:

we want to do in terms of energy to energy

Speaker:

teleportation with computing over the next 20, 30 years. Like let's say there are

Speaker:

concepts called energy, quantum energy teleportation,

Speaker:

which is actually done on a very, very nano level where you could

Speaker:

transmit energy from one

Speaker:

place to another at a quantum mechanical way. Now

Speaker:

imagine that you can do this at a atmospheric wave, like let's see, on the

Speaker:

space you can get sunlight and quantum energy

Speaker:

teleport to the ground station without

Speaker:

any loss. And that energy intensity would be extremely

Speaker:

high. So those kind of things

Speaker:

are like extremely theoretical, but which

Speaker:

we tend to do. So a person like me, when I see something

Speaker:

extremely rare to occur, I really

Speaker:

get excited. So I always

Speaker:

wish them good luck to make it happen.

Speaker:

Now when it comes to quantum and climate in our topic, which

Speaker:

we speak about today, how

Speaker:

I see it is

Speaker:

I always want it to happen right now rather than waiting.

Speaker:

That's my nature. But if you

Speaker:

look at all these reports and how the progression is taking place

Speaker:

in the next three to five years is more of like the roadmap for Quantum

Speaker:

provided by McKinsey to IBM. So if you look at a company doing

Speaker:

quantum and climate, how I would perceive it is okay. They're working on

Speaker:

the fundamental elements to make it possible

Speaker:

so that their maturity will come in that three to five years

Speaker:

or maybe later. And that is also something we also

Speaker:

experienced when we were trying to build our platform around

Speaker:

quantum and climate. But then we realized

Speaker:

what we're doing is it's actually a general purpose thing. It's not just

Speaker:

climate. You can do it from climate to chemistry to finance to everything.

Speaker:

So the last one year we opened up the platform to every user

Speaker:

and that actually democratized our platform into

Speaker:

quantum as well. Like democratizing quantum. So

Speaker:

I think to give a short answer,

Speaker:

how do I assess, I think it's based

Speaker:

on the probability of not happening is

Speaker:

Very high. I always just get

Speaker:

excited. That's how I would assess it.

Speaker:

Well, there's a lot to be exciting about. Right. Like, you know, we

Speaker:

missed out because of, you know, we were, you know,

Speaker:

born too late to be there when the transistor

Speaker:

kind of exploded in the PC revolution.

Speaker:

And this is an opportunity, I think, for, for people who are

Speaker:

in industry now or, you know, in university today to like

Speaker:

participate in kind of something that's going to be at least as impactful as

Speaker:

that on society and everything.

Speaker:

Sorry, sidetrack. But you know,

Speaker:

what do you think is the biggest misconception that

Speaker:

you're facing in quantum computing? With climate

Speaker:

in the climate ecosystem? Yeah. So

Speaker:

when it comes to the basis misconception is that

Speaker:

quantum will replace normal computers or classical

Speaker:

computers, I think that is the biggest misconception

Speaker:

we hear about and whether we will have quantum computers in our

Speaker:

household. So I

Speaker:

was having a meeting like few hours ago

Speaker:

prior to this event. It was a European

Speaker:

university I was working with and one of the students asked me whether we are

Speaker:

going to have computers, quantum computers in our household.

Speaker:

So I, I think it's,

Speaker:

it's, it's just the unawareness of quantum because it

Speaker:

has become a buzzword and if there's a lot of unawareness.

Speaker:

Right. So when it comes to quantum and climate, I think it's a

Speaker:

very, very niche audience who would

Speaker:

look quantum and climate together with that.

Speaker:

I think one of the biggest. Huh. I

Speaker:

think the biggest

Speaker:

misconception is

Speaker:

quantum alone could solve climate. Right?

Speaker:

Okay. Yeah. Because it's, it's

Speaker:

not quantum who will go and solve climate. It's, it's, it.

Speaker:

Quantum to classical to all this computing should

Speaker:

facilitate the scientists to come and make the discoveries.

Speaker:

Even though quantum is a reality, it will not come and do that magic. It

Speaker:

should be a conjunctive effort of CPUs to

Speaker:

GPUs to quantum, all working together with the scientists to make those

Speaker:

discoveries. It's not the technology that will come and solve. I think that would

Speaker:

be a point of view I would have. Yeah.

Speaker:

Interesting.

Speaker:

What advice would you give someone who is

Speaker:

building the community or content around all this climate

Speaker:

innovation?

Speaker:

Yeah, I, I think for this I would like to quote

Speaker:

Bill Gates. He said in his book

Speaker:

how to avoid a Climate Disaster. So in that

Speaker:

he referred that if it's not outside your

Speaker:

house, you will not know it. So only when things are

Speaker:

outside of your house, like let's say if there is a big flood outside your

Speaker:

house or in your neighborhood, then only you will know. Okay. There is some Big

Speaker:

issue is out there in the. But when it comes to a climate

Speaker:

aspect, it's those little, little things that happens in the

Speaker:

environmental ecosystem that will create this

Speaker:

big things. So I think for content

Speaker:

creators who are in climate who speaks about it, I

Speaker:

think they should

Speaker:

tell what like everybody

Speaker:

knows about climate global warming for the last few decades.

Speaker:

I think they don't know the current, the.

Speaker:

The probability of having a catastrophe. For example, in my

Speaker:

team I, I speak a lot about this planetary systems model

Speaker:

where there are nine systems and out of nine how many have gone into

Speaker:

the. To the red zone. Likewise. So

Speaker:

these things actually not largely spoken. Only few, few people

Speaker:

are speaking it out there. I think largely the content creator should speak about

Speaker:

okay, out of nine systems, seven the red

Speaker:

zone. And there is a high probability that we will have these kind of issues.

Speaker:

So this is what you should do as individuals

Speaker:

to make that change. Example, if you're a software development

Speaker:

company, go to green hosting.

Speaker:

How could you make your application green? So that is a very

Speaker:

segment oriented content creation but that will create impact.

Speaker:

Likewise and if you're using chat GPT okay, don't say hi because I

Speaker:

will just create another.

Speaker:

It's just even how to prompting is a good area to create

Speaker:

content around climate because those will actually create

Speaker:

tangible results out there in the market or in the world.

Speaker:

I just everybody knows, okay, you need to use recyclable

Speaker:

things. From the school days you have been taught to do that. But now

Speaker:

the systems are different because the world is different. You need

Speaker:

more day to day generation specific

Speaker:

content around climate, around awareness as well as how to adapt or

Speaker:

change. Okay,

Speaker:

interesting.

Speaker:

Do you think the climate innovation in quantum that's going to happen

Speaker:

is going to be paired with AI?

Speaker:

Absolutely, absolutely. Because all the. Because

Speaker:

if you look at how, if you look at how innovations

Speaker:

have evolved or how real breakthroughs happen in the world, it's just not one

Speaker:

technology. It's a combination of all these

Speaker:

technologies working harmoniously and

Speaker:

driving real change. So it's not just the

Speaker:

semiconductor that created the Mac. It's

Speaker:

the hardware, the wiring, the semiconductor, the, the.

Speaker:

The. The glass technology or the, the how the screen

Speaker:

technology all together created the map or the iPhone. The

Speaker:

revolutionary breakthroughs. So it's not just

Speaker:

quantum or any other technique. It's

Speaker:

most likely be all CPUs, GPUs, AI,

Speaker:

the mathematical models, everything. All working harmoniously

Speaker:

will bring solutions. And

Speaker:

I think AI will be a great catalyst

Speaker:

to speed things up. Okay, for

Speaker:

example this not yet built but it's in our roadmap.

Speaker:

Which will be released early next year. We are building

Speaker:

quantum research agents who will work or research

Speaker:

247 uncertain given projects run on

Speaker:

quantum simulations and give results. So this we actually.

Speaker:

So there is a new way of knowledge creation which was not

Speaker:

there before without AI. So

Speaker:

AI will be infused with everything.

Speaker:

But, but how will human

Speaker:

intuition or that wisdom

Speaker:

side of things will play out is

Speaker:

I think that will be the most

Speaker:

important part I guess in this whole transformation. Like

Speaker:

I don't think what Einstein found will be

Speaker:

discovered by an agent. By an agent or an AI.

Speaker:

I see what you mean. Yeah. But the next

Speaker:

Einstein will probably be helped by an agent or some kind of

Speaker:

agent. Exactly. Exactly.

Speaker:

Interesting. How can the

Speaker:

government. I mean Sri Lanka just suffered a devastating

Speaker:

cyclone. I

Speaker:

saw that on the news this, this past week.

Speaker:

How can the government better support the adoption of these complex

Speaker:

climate technologies without slowing down

Speaker:

innovation at the same time?

Speaker:

Absolutely. Great question. So. So

Speaker:

in. In Sri Lanka. Okay, I. I'll

Speaker:

take it in Sri Lanka the and the

Speaker:

global landscape. So in, in Sri Lanka

Speaker:

we got out of a certain crisis situation

Speaker:

and now we were back back on track and then the floods came in.

Speaker:

So in Sri Lanka innovation is

Speaker:

so we. We have a huge deep tech community in Sri Lanka

Speaker:

starting from biotech to like people

Speaker:

like us who are doing quantum and so much

Speaker:

more around and EVs likewise.

Speaker:

So the, the universities, the government.

Speaker:

So there's a massive amount of initiatives that's

Speaker:

going out there. I think it's more of like taking to a global stage

Speaker:

to

Speaker:

get the right investments to to let's say

Speaker:

having part global partners is more of like a current

Speaker:

initiative that is happening to make sure these technologies

Speaker:

scale because there's a lot of things that's happening

Speaker:

within the country that's not out there.

Speaker:

So the government's support is now

Speaker:

being put a lot to those kind of innovation. So this includes

Speaker:

climate solutions as well. Climate tech to different sustainable

Speaker:

solutions many others. Because

Speaker:

sometimes it's not just within Sri Lanka. These enterprises should also

Speaker:

go out to outside the world and then only these models will also

Speaker:

be better and better and become

Speaker:

much more production ready.

Speaker:

So there is on one end but if you look at the the

Speaker:

Europe or the US I'm sorry especially around Europe the European

Speaker:

Union is having a lot of CL up

Speaker:

modeling related fund related funding to grants games

Speaker:

like us. I think those collaboration is something

Speaker:

that is being encouraged at the moment.

Speaker:

Yeah, that's my take around

Speaker:

it. It's an exciting time to be in. This industry, isn't it?

Speaker:

Right. It is exciting yeah. And like I think

Speaker:

2025 was like, we'll look back at that

Speaker:

as a particularly

Speaker:

interesting year. Right. I don't know,

Speaker:

maybe next year will be more exciting and we won't even remember this year. Who

Speaker:

knows? Absolutely. Hopefully.

Speaker:I believe that:Speaker:

2027 are going to be extremely,

Speaker:

very interesting years because even in the quantum space there's

Speaker:

going to be a lot of hardware maturity coming

Speaker:

in. There's a lot of topics being spoken around industrial

Speaker:

applications, around quantum. So this will cover a lot of climate use

Speaker:

cases, practicalities and maybe

Speaker:,:Speaker:

have more quantum advantage achieved use cases

Speaker:terprise level, hopefully. So:Speaker:

are going to be very, very interesting years

Speaker:

to look out for and

Speaker:

we too look forward for some breakthroughs.

Speaker:

Yeah,

Speaker:

interesting.

Speaker:

Where do you see. I'm just awash in possibilities. I'm so sorry, I'm

Speaker:

just awash in possibilities. Possibilities. Where do you see the biggest

Speaker:

gaps between what energy companies need

Speaker:

and what the deep tech researchers are building right now?

Speaker:

Okay. When it comes to deep tech it's again,

Speaker:

it's a very broad spectrum. But I'll fixate into

Speaker:

quantum. I think

Speaker:

one, I think there are two areas. One is.

Speaker:

How exactly will quantum create

Speaker:

value for me is a

Speaker:

question that is asked by industry from quantum companies.

Speaker:

That is an awareness problem. And,

Speaker:

and then secondly, when you get past that state,

Speaker:

can it create value now?

Speaker:

Still the answer is no, unless you are preparing for research.

Speaker:

So that is what I've

Speaker:

seen publicly and as well as the certain interactions

Speaker:

I've had together with certain companies.

Speaker:

So mostly it's at a POC level, not at a production grade

Speaker:

limitation being the hardware maturity, the instability of

Speaker:

the, the quantum error correction likewise.

Speaker:

But at a POC level there are many, many use cases coming in.

Speaker:

Right. But internally, which is because all

Speaker:

these are R D. Right. These are research topics, you don't put it out there.

Speaker:

So internally there can be a lot of things that energy

Speaker:

companies are investing in quantum to keep themselves ready. Which is

Speaker:

not out there in the public or open out loud. Spoken out

Speaker:

loud. But those are probably a lot of. Secret projects

Speaker:

going on. Exactly. That they're not gonna particularly like. You don't know

Speaker:

what they're working on until it's a massive success and even then. Exactly. There's

Speaker:

no one unless there's some regulatory reason, they're not really incentivized

Speaker:

to help their competition. This is popular across

Speaker:

energy to pharma because it's all R and D. Right. You use it

Speaker:

for your next usp. But what I said

Speaker:

is something that we all mostly face, not only us, but

Speaker:

mostly many other companies when we do PoCs with

Speaker:

companies.

Speaker:

Did we lose him? No, no, we haven't. No, he's

Speaker:

here. We're just, we're coming up with our next. My mind is just like, I

Speaker:

know, same here. So many ways. It's so wonderful. Yeah, yeah.

Speaker:

It's an exciting field. And I think a lot of people are

Speaker:

skeptical of all the promises AI has made.

Speaker:

Rightfully so, because some ridiculous promises have been made.

Speaker:

I do worry that

Speaker:

Quantum can also eventually part of the hype

Speaker:

cycle, I guess, is ridiculous promises, right? But

Speaker:

when kind of the hype wave crashes,

Speaker:

there are still new possibilities. I mean, look at the dot com boom, right? Like,

Speaker:

you know, pets.com, right, is, you know, I don't know if you're, you may not

Speaker:

be old enough to remember tets.com but pets.com was like this. There were a

Speaker:

lot of crazy startups that were started in the 90s that

Speaker:

were way ahead of their time. Right

Speaker:

now it's fair to say Amazon kind of owns that space. Right.

Speaker:

You know, in most countries. Right. The world we live

Speaker:

in today with the, you know, the smartphone and things like that, these were all

Speaker:

things that were, I would say, promised in the

Speaker:

dot com era, but the underlying technology wasn't quite there to

Speaker:

make it practical. I

Speaker:

wonder what that will look like for, you know, the Quantum hype wave.

Speaker:

Could be similar. Yeah, could be, could be similar.

Speaker:

But when it comes to Quantum, it can be slightly different

Speaker:

because it's, it's mostly

Speaker:

with the scientific community. It's not like a dot com boom

Speaker:

where it's mostly accessible or spoken out loud. I mean, I

Speaker:

mean, like, because it goes with a lot of math and physics.

Speaker:

So I, it's not a general, am I? But what I was trying to say

Speaker:

was it's not a general purpose kind of general public kind of a thing.

Speaker:

You have to go with science and likewise. But when it comes to AI, of

Speaker:

course there can be similar patterns coming in and likewise.

Speaker:

But.

Speaker:

I think it's, it's, it's so

Speaker:

this. How do I put it?

Speaker:

You can. I believe that.

Speaker:

I, I actually don't believe

Speaker:

about that wave personally

Speaker:

because, because

Speaker:

deep down what we believe is to move the world forward.

Speaker:

So that's our underlying philosophy and that's

Speaker:

at an early stage that what I wanted to do,

Speaker:

what can I do to move the world forward? So that has been my

Speaker:

personal motto. And when I started off in

Speaker:

2014, we developed software that with that inspiration we actually did a

Speaker:

lot of things, did a lot of movement around

Speaker:

in our community with our customers likewise.

Speaker:

And what we believe with Feynman is

Speaker:

that over the years a lot

Speaker:

of studies have been there where

Speaker:

potentially how quant, how the branches of

Speaker:

theoretical physics could bring value to

Speaker:

people or to, for us.

Speaker:

And if we can take one part of theoretical

Speaker:

physics like quantum computing back in the days and now practically apply,

Speaker:

just forgetting about this hype curve and really make a breakthrough,

Speaker:

that's what we are heading towards. So personally

Speaker:

I really don't worry much about hype

Speaker:

curves, whether I just believe in the science and what we

Speaker:

can do, which is controllable for us.

Speaker:

And if things are not working, yes, we

Speaker:

pivot, but I think deep down

Speaker:

we look for that moment,

Speaker:

what we do right now, can we really move the world

Speaker:

forward? I think that's, that's our driving force. When

Speaker:

we have that framework in our mind, that hype

Speaker:

and those things becomes noise in a way. Right,

Speaker:

Interesting. It's, it's how I govern myself.

Speaker:

No, I mean that's a great way to look at it. I don't think. I

Speaker:

think it's a healthy way to look at it. Right. And it is

Speaker:

very easy to get caught up in the hype cycle and the hype wave. But

Speaker:

at the end of the day, I think I like your approaches, you know,

Speaker:

self governance. Right. Because

Speaker:

then you're not chasing what's coming next. It's something that you

Speaker:

intuitively say your gut feel everything all together.

Speaker:

It's not just a very logical thing or a market

Speaker:

reaction you are chasing. It's something that you envision

Speaker:

and that brings much more confidence, stability

Speaker:

in what you do, even in the most darkest

Speaker:

times, because it's a belief that you're chasing

Speaker:

and it becomes a reality.

Speaker:

That's a good way to put it. Is there any other advice that you would

Speaker:

give, let's say students who are in university now,

Speaker:

you know, let's say who are in computer science and they're trying to figure out

Speaker:

a potential path. Like what, what advice would you give them

Speaker:

considering where you are now? Absolutely. So

Speaker:

I think it's not at all related

Speaker:

to quantum or climate. So it's, it's, it's, it's, it's

Speaker:

purely about self

Speaker:

discovery.

Speaker:

It's, it's purely about self discovery.

Speaker:

Example, this book called Ikigai, where you

Speaker:

have this beautiful Venn diagram. But you love to do what the world needs,

Speaker:

what you can do likewise. And it's just one

Speaker:

model. But even if you just really explore yourself

Speaker:

and see what you are deeply, deeply passionate about,

Speaker:

deeply, that gets you into the flow state

Speaker:

that you can keep on doing. I think

Speaker:

being honest with yourself and figuring that out at the early,

Speaker:

early stage will definitely give you answers to all

Speaker:

the decisions that you want to take in life.

Speaker:

Because it's your journey. The decisions you take will not

Speaker:

you. It doesn't have to justify other people's frameworks

Speaker:

or what their thought processes are. So. And

Speaker:

you will have your own compass inside when you have yourself

Speaker:

cleared out. That's what Bruce said. That's what Steve Jobs Jobs said. That's what

Speaker:

any,

Speaker:

Any of these philosophers have said. So for me, I think early on

Speaker:

I met mentors and coaches who

Speaker:

actually helped me carve that picture out. For me, I think that is

Speaker:

the most important thing for you to understand yourself, self

Speaker:

discover and final remarks,

Speaker:

whatever you do, student, entrepreneur,

Speaker:

career employed, I think

Speaker:

whatever you do, it's all about you. Think big,

Speaker:

start small and work fast. So think big, start small

Speaker:

and work fast. Work fast. Yes. Okay, where can

Speaker:

folks find out more about you, about Feynman and

Speaker:

anything else you'd like to share? Yeah, so

Speaker:

I think you can of course have the web links and

Speaker:

all, but you can always catch me on LinkedIn x

Speaker:

any social media platform as Adisha or Disha Government pillar and

Speaker:

website is feynmanhq.com and

Speaker:

everything is pretty much connected so you will see the content. But I think you

Speaker:

can also share the reference links in your captions and

Speaker:

all. Fantastic. Excellent. Thank you so much

Speaker:

for today. I, you know, climate affects everybody and this

Speaker:

was really fantastic. I really appreciated your time on

Speaker:

this. And we'll play the outro music the.

Speaker:

Universe dances it snug as a

Speaker:

rotten podcast Turn it up

Speaker:

fast Kenneth and Frank blowing my mind at last

Speaker:

Quantum podcast.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *